Critiquing Outside The Comfort Zone

Last week, a friend of mine asked me to do an unusual critique. I’m glad I took her up on it.

This friend, though not a fiction writer, is a professional in nonfiction and has worked as an editor. She’s done reading for me in the past, and provided me with a lot of valuable insights. So, even though I doubted I had anything useful to say about her project, I decided to give it a try.

Her project was a gift for someone else. At their request, she had written essentially a literary criticism essay using characters in action, blending the meanings of tarot cards with interpretations of the original novel’s text. It also included extrapolations of scenes that did not appear in the original text (fanfiction), only written not as story but as a sort of nonfictional hypertext. The piece was written partly as an essay, partly as (almost) fiction. You could call it a hybrid piece of writing, or an intersectional one. Or you could just say, “What?” because I have confused you…anyway, it made sense when I read it. Complicated sense.

Fictional events from the text were explored and extrapolated in a semi-fictional style, interspersed with relevant information on the tarot cards she’d chosen and images of those cards. The piece wasn’t fiction, but it had some of the aspects of fiction. That was one of the things she wanted me to critique.

It turned out I did have something to say. After admiring the way she’d linked appropriate references from the text to specific tarot cards, I went through it again and focused on voice. The writer’s nonfiction voice is very strong and flexible and unique. In most of the segments, I recognized her voice. I suspect I would have recognized it even if I weren’t already familiar with her writing. However, in one section, her voice was not as strong. She’d leaned more heavily towards fiction in that section; her own voice had been mostly subsumed into a tight third person fictional pov. As a fiction writer, that really stood out to me.

It turned out that section had given her a lot of trouble. She’d started out in first person that wasn’t working for what she wanted to accomplish and had spent a lot of time shifting the point of view. I think my comments helped her focus on how she wanted to edit that section. Besides that, her piece gave me a lot to think about for my own writing.

Once again, it’s been proven to me how stepping outside your comfort zone–in reading, in critiquing–can be a real benefit to thinking about your writing in different ways.

About Victoria Janssen

Victoria Janssen [she, her] currently writes cozy space opera for Kalikoi. The novella series A Place of Refuge begins with Finding Refuge: Telepathic warrior Talia Avi, genius engineer Miki Boudreaux, and augmented soldier Faigin Balfour fought the fascist Federated Colonies for ten years, following the charismatic dissenter Jon Churchill. Then Jon disappeared, Talia was thought dead, and Miki and Faigin struggled to take Jon’s place and stay alive. When the FC is unexpectedly upended, Talia is reunited with her friends and they are given sanctuary on the enigmatic planet Refuge. The trio of former guerillas strive to recover from lifetimes of trauma, build new lives on a planet with endless horizons, and forge tender new connections with each other.
This entry was posted in writing, writing craft and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Critiquing Outside The Comfort Zone

  1. Great post. The two CPs I’ve worked with write different sub-genres from me, UF and rom suspense respectively. I think that’s really worked for the reasons you cite – as CPs we can bring something fresh to the table, and also you learn while you read the others’ writing. The rom suspense really helped when I came to revise action scenes in my own WIP and could see how un-pacey they were.

  2. Yes! I think it helps even more when the subgenre is different.

Comments are closed.