Historical Detail in Fiction

I’ve been putting together my thoughts on how I include history in novels, for example the World War One detail in Moonlight Mistress.

The first thing is to create a sense of normality. The characters do ordinary things in an ordinary way; ordinary, that is, for this year in this place. Specificity is key.

For example, in writing description, writing teachers often laud the virtues of specificity: not a flower, but a freshly unfurled red tulip as bright as candy.

When a novel is historical, you don’t have to make up most of those details; your research takes care of that. I research, as most people do, far more than I “need” to research, but that extra effort can pay off in unexpectedly useful ways. So the first thing is knowing specific details, or having them handy for when they’re needed.

The second thing is an ongoing process. I don’t insert my historical factoids at precise, mathematically calculated intervals. I drip them in instead, like rain working its way through a roof to occasionally trickle down your neck. This I can break down into a numbered list.

1. If you have an opportunity to use a historical detail rather than a vague detail, do it. Don’t rummage in your pocket; rummage in the pocket of your poplin shirtwaist.

2. It helps to keep in mind what has changed between then and now. Those are things the reader needs to know to before they can be immersed in this new world. To a character in 1914, the daily arrival of the iceman would be an ordinary event; so if you need a bit of business to dress up a conversation, perhaps you could interrupt their conversation, briefly, by the iceman’s arrival.

3. Details work better in action than in description alone; that’s a general principle I’ve seen in many guides to writing. So one can describe a room and note the collection of hats on a hatstand, because women wore hats every day, but it’s better if the reader sees those hats because the woman is selecting one to wear for an afternoon’s shopping. Details inserted in this way can accumulate to good effect.

4. A big pet peeve of mine, which I will never write, and I recommend no one else write either: “Oh, come now! It’s [name your year/era]! We’re modern people, we don’t do that any more!”

5. And sometimes one does simply describe, just as in non-historical writing. Don’t go overboard in avoiding brief descriptive passages. If the character is visiting a huge, magnificent site, they would take note of its hugeness and magnificence and spend a few moments looking around before doing anything else.

The photos in this post are from World War One. Yes, they did have color photographs!

Related Posts:
Synergy in Writing and Research.
Reading for the Writer.

What are your tips and tricks for writing historical settings?

Posted in historical fiction, writing craft | 5 Comments

Siegfried Sassoon, "Sick Leave"

Sick Leave

When I’m asleep, dreaming and lulled and warm,–
They come, the homeless ones, the noiseless dead.
While the dim charging breakers of the storm
Bellow and drone and rumble overhead,
Out of the gloom they gather about my bed.
They whisper to my heart; their thoughts are mine.
‘Why are you here with all your watches ended?
From Ypres to Frise we sought you in the Line.’
In bitter safety I awake, unfriended;
And while the dawn begins with slashing rain
I think of the Battalion in the mud.
‘When are you going out to them again?
Are they not still your brothers through our blood?’

–Siegfried Sassoon, Counter-Attack and Other Poems, 1918

Posted in sassoon, wwi poetry | Comments Off on Siegfried Sassoon, "Sick Leave"

Simon Sheppard quote

From The Burning Pen: Sex Writers on Sex Writing, Simon Sheppard’s essay “Mondo Pomo Porno”:

“So one of the things porn can do, especially well-crafted, thoughtful erotica, is help convince us that sex is worth not just talking about but thinking about. In depth. …erotica is given the freedom to speak of consequences, to admit that, yes, desire can be frightening and awful and truly destructive but is worth pursuing all the same.”

“Sure, fiction is made up, and writers are liars. But that doesn’t mean we should be dishonest liars. Each of us has a truth to tell…genre writing can become transcendent if it’s written from the heart.”

Related Posts: Making It Good and Preliminary Thoughts on Two Types of Erotic Novels.

Posted in erotica, quotes | Comments Off on Simon Sheppard quote

the big bang theory of fiction

The “Muppet Morsels” glosses on my DVDs of The Muppet Show are sometimes only loosely related to the episode, so it’s hard to remember where this one came from.

I paraphrase: “every skit ends with either an explosion or a digestion.”

I.e., something blows up, or somebody gets eaten.

This could be generally applicable to all fiction.

Boom! Nom nom nom.

Books would be a lot more fun if it was literal.

Elizabeth and Darcy marry–and a giant sheep eats Lady Catherine De Burgh!

Moby Dick explodes!

David Copperfield turns into a zombie and eats everyone!

Your suggestions?

Happy Friday!

Posted in quotes, writing craft | 2 Comments

Learning Who Your Characters Are

I am not one of those writers whose characters talk to them, not in the literal hearing-voices-in-your-head way, nor do I like using that as a metaphor for character creation. Probably because I like to be in control. I also think that’s why I never got into role-playing games; I didn’t want other people’s ideas interfering with my own and changing them. I talk to other people about my characters sometimes, and have used ideas others have given me, but I don’t think that’s the same; I’m still in charge of my own characters.

But enough about me wearing a crown and being The Mighty Dictator.

What techniques do I use?

1. Give character a name and gender. This in itself often tells me other things; for example, to pick a name I might have to know the character’s ethnicity.

2. Figure out the character’s function in the story. Sometimes, often, this comes before name and gender.

3. I don’t write the biography of my character. I usually make things up as I need them, or as they occur to me. A novel character might be the sidekick in the previous novel. Before, we know he had two sisters. Now that he’s a protagonist, those sisters need names and problems.

4. If I get stuck, sometimes I make notes. I’ve tried the “list of adjectives to describe X” technique with some success. Also, “what are X’s problems, and what in his character made these problems terrible to him?”

A technique I’ve used a couple of times as a starting point is to use the characteristics of a particular Zodiac sign or personality type diagram.

5. I write scenes with the character included. Dialogue is most fun and works well for me, and is most likely to produce revelations. Arguments are good. Losing control is good. What is she like then? I don’t think a writer can really understand a character until they’ve written her into scenes, because the way she is in your head is never exactly the same as she appears on paper (at least for me). Tipsheets are fine, but it’s showing the character in action that makes her live.

6. Finally, there’s letting go. Sometimes I stop and do something else for a while, like reading or going for a walk. When I go back to work, sometimes my subconscious has come up with connections I hadn’t realized before, such as “Josefina’s mother was a union organizer,” which I can then work into the story.

Related posts:
Caring About Your Characters – Or Not.
Zero Drafting.

Posted in writing craft, writing process | 9 Comments

Philadelphia Fantastic Reading

I’ll be reading at Philadelphia Fantastic this week:

February 27, 2009
7:30 pm
Moonstone Art Center
110A S. 13th Street (13th and Sansom)
Philadelphia, PA

Philly Fantastic readings usually last approximately an hour, so this is a long reading. Attendees are invited out afterwards for dinner and/or drinks.

Posted in promo, the duchess | Comments Off on Philadelphia Fantastic Reading

Sex scenes in romance novels: what I like

Sex scenes in romance novels, I feel, need to move the plot along by encompassing some sort of character change or modulation. But what else makes a sex scene a success? Clearly, it’s one of those questions in which individual mileage can vary. Here’s a list of what I think makes a great sex scene, though I don’t think all of these things necessarily need to be in the same scene.

1. At least one character with an emotional stake in the proceedings, who needs/wants something from the sex or from the relationship.

2. A character who is hiding something. This may be emotional, physical, or plot-related, but I think it adds a level of tension to the scene.

3. Intense focus from at least one of the characters. If at least one of the characters is deeply involved in what’s going on, I as a reader am usually going to be involved, too.

4. Something new is revealed about at least one of the characters, preferably a thing that implies many other things. The relationship and the characterizations can thus grow and deepen after the scene is over.

5. Economy of action: only the actions essential to the scene are described, i.e., those actions that underline the scene’s emotional or thematic arc, or explicate character, or both. This is mainly because I love tidiness.

What do you like to see in romance novel sex scenes?

Posted in reading, romance novels, writing craft | 2 Comments

Mark Twain on Mardi Gras

“The largest annual event in New Orleans is a something which we arrived too late to sample–the Mardi-Gras festivities. I saw the procession of the Mystic Crew of Comus there, twenty-four years ago–with knights and nobles and so on, clothed in silken and golden Paris-made gorgeousnesses, planned and bought for that single night’s use; and in their train all manner of giants, dwarfs, monstrosities, and other diverting grotesquerie–a startling and wonderful sort of show, as it filed solemnly and silently down the street in the light of its smoking and flickering torches; but it is said that in these latter days the spectacle is mightily augmented, as to cost, splendor, and variety. There is a chief personage–‘Rex;’ and if I remember rightly, neither this king nor any of his great following of subordinates is known to any outsider. All these people are gentlemen of position and consequence; and it is a proud thing to belong to the organization; so the mystery in which they hide their personality is merely for romance’s sake, and not on account of the police.

“Mardi-Gras is of course a relic of the French and Spanish occupation; but I judge that the religious feature has been pretty well knocked out of it now. Sir Walter has got the advantage of the gentlemen of the cowl and rosary, and he will stay. His medieval business, supplemented by the monsters and the oddities, and the pleasant creatures from fairy-land, is finer to look at than the poor fantastic inventions and performances of the reveling rabble of the priest’s day, and serves quite as well, perhaps, to emphasize the day and admonish men that the grace-line between the worldly season and the holy one is reached. “

–Mark Twain, Life on the Mississippi (1883)

Posted in holiday | Comments Off on Mark Twain on Mardi Gras

Synergy in Writing and Research

A good thing about writing several novels one after the other is that it becomes easier to notice patterns in the way one works.

Some things I learned are generally applicable. For example, this time I know stretches of rough draft in which nothing happens will eventually make sense, or they won’t, and if they don’t make sense, I can cut them. I know now I will cut a lot. Thousands of words with each draft. Paradoxically, that makes it easier for me to put words on the page. Thank you, Greg Frost, for “give yourself permission to write crap,” no matter whose pithy quote it was in the beginning.

Another thing I’ve noticed is that research isn’t something one does and then is finished with. There seems to be a baseline amount of knowledge my mind needs, but once I’ve hit that level, ideas start to form, and I start writing. In the course of writing, I discover things I need to know, often small but important things, like “if she buys a hat in this particular summer, what kind will it be, and how much will it cost?” Then I go and find that out and slip it into the text. Sometimes I use placeholder information until I have a chance to research again; this is rough draft, after all.

Other times, the research process is more nebulous. If feeling stuck, not stuck enough to stop writing, but stuck enough that inspiration would be welcome, research can help. For example, I can read period newspapers and make notes, with few expectations beyond, “see if I can find anything about Thanksgiving.” And in the course of that generalized reading, come across some facts about a sugar shortage which I can use to shore up an event I’d already written in the text.

Then there’s the research that’s going on parallel to the writing. This is usually books. I generally search for books in groups by topic, work my way through those, and then move on to another topic; this seems to help my mind organize what it’s learning. Books are good because, unlike the microfiche machine, I can carry them around, marking pages with sticky notes or making notes in my notebook, or sometimes typing up the notes for easy reference when I have my laptop and nothing else.

These books are often where the synergy comes in. I’m writing, writing, writing, and sometimes my parallel track of reading shows me, “That thing that happened to this guy, it can happen to my guy! Except with my guy, it would be like this…” and I’m off. Then I go to the other books I’ve accumulated on that topic, and get more ideas, and so on.The only trick to this is explained in another pithy quote I got from Greg, and this one is his own, I think: “Don’t research it to death,” which is what he told me years ago when I began my first attempt at a historical. Just because I’m using a book for research doesn’t mean I have to read every word. I skim as much as I can, to the parts I know I can use. (Sure, I get involved in reading probably not-useful bits every now and again, but I try to avoid this.) If I need those bits I skimmed over, I can always go back to the book later. Initially, I am ruthless. I pillage for what’s useful, because if I read everything, I won’t have time to write. If I don’t write, I won’t know what I need to research next. And then where would I be? Looking at an unfinished manuscript, no doubt.

Related Post: Reading for the Writer.

Posted in historical fiction, research, writing craft | Comments Off on Synergy in Writing and Research

Suspension of Disbelief in Romance Novels versus Short Erotic Stories

I’m not making a huge point here, but I think it might be a significant one for how I approach writing erotica as opposed to longer romantic works. I think the reader of a short erotica story is more willing to make assumptions from little evidence. They know where the story is leading; it is leading to two characters having sex; so for that to happen, the relationship (romantic, purely physical, whatever) must exist, so it does exist, at least so long as the writer has given the reader a tiny, tiny hook on which to hang their belief.

In a romance novel, things have to ring true for a long time, sinking into the reader’s mind bit by bit, like building a wall. Sure, a reader of Romance knows the genre, knows what’s expected, knows how things will turn out; but as I’ve said before, because of that, process (how the relationship progresses) is often more important in a romance novel than outcome (happy ending). So if the process isn’t believable, the story falls apart and the reader falls out of that world.

Related Posts: Making It Good and Preliminary Thoughts on Two Types of Erotic Novels.

Posted in erotica, genre, romance novels | Comments Off on Suspension of Disbelief in Romance Novels versus Short Erotic Stories